Adegbite, The Owa-ale Of Ikare V. Alasan Babatunde, The Olukare Odo (1953)
Table of Contents
ToggleLawGlobal Hub Judgment Report – West African Court of Appeal
Claim to chieftainship—Validity of appointment and status of another chief
challenged—Assertion of subsidiary claims also—Precedence and privilege
having no monetary value—Jurisdiction of Court to entertain action considered.
Facts
The appellant appealed against the judgment of the West African Court of Appeal which had allowed the respondent’s appeal and held that the Court had no jurisdiction to entertain appellant’s claim on the grounds that it was a suit challenging the validity of the appointm6nt of a Chief and that the subsidiary claims were also solely related to procedure dignity or primacy which did not involve definite material rights.
Held
The question of jurisdiction could not be properly decided without ascertaining the facts. It was essential to ascertain what by native law and custom was the status of the respondent the Olukare.
The first question to be decided was whether the respondent was a subordinate chief of a quarter of Ikare or was he the head chief of the whole of Ikare.
Appeal allowed.
Related Posts:
- Joseph Osemwegie Idehen & Ors. Vs George Otutu…
- C. I. Olaniyan & Ors. V. University Of Lagos & Anor…
- R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) v…
- R (on the application of AM) (AP) v The Director of…
- R (on the application of AM) (AP) v The Director of…
- R (on the application of Smith) (FC) v Secretary of…