Rex V. Emmanuel Joseph Cobolah (1944)
Table of Contents
ToggleLawGlobal Hub Judgment Report – West African Court of Appeal
Criminal Law, Procedure, and Evidence—Expert evidence on handwriting—Privilege not to produce proceedings—Discretion as to the calling of a witness—Judgment immediately after hearing—Cap. 4, s. 77.
Facts
Defendant was convicted at Assizes of falsifying accounts and of stealing on ample evidence. On appeal it was argued that a policeman could not give expert evidence on handwriting ; that the proceedings in the Government Inquiry relative to the falsification of accounts should not have been withheld on the plea of privilege ; and that the Court should have called a witness whom the Crown did not ; and he took exception to the Judge’s reading out his judgment immediately after the close of the hearing.
Held
(I) that a policeman who had made a study of handwriting could give expert evidence in the Gold Coast ;
that evidence taken at an inquiry could not be admitted as evidence in the trial if in the opinion of the Colonial Secretary it was in the public interest not to produce it ;
that the trial Judge had rightly used his discretion in refusing to call a witness whom either party could have called ;
that there is nothing to prevent a Judge from writing his judgment after the close of all the evidence subject to any amendment he may wish to make on the Bench due to the submissions of Counsel.
The appeal is dismissed.
Related Posts:
- R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) v…
- R (on the application of AM) (AP) v The Director of…
- R (on the application of AM) (AP) v The Director of…
- Joseph Osemwegie Idehen & Ors. Vs George Otutu…
- R (on the application of Smith) (FC) v Secretary of…
- His Highness Lamidi Olayiwola Adeyemi (Alafin Of…