Anthony Aburime V. The Secretary, Assemblies Of God Mission, Ewu Ishan & Anor (1952)
Table of Contents
ToggleLawGlobal Hub Judgment Report – West Africa Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction—Supreme Court Ordinance, section 12 and proviso—Practice and Procedure—Claim in trespass—Ouster of jurisdiction how decided.
Facts
The plaintiff sued in trespass, the first defendant alleged entry under a lease and the second defendant that he would contend that the issue was as to title to land. The Judge suo motu raised the point of ouster of jurisdiction and plaintiff opposed the idea. The Judge took no evidence but concluded that his jurisdiction was ousted under the above proviso (text in judgment infra); he assumed that there was a Native Court with jurisdiction to hear the case. The plaintiff appealed.
Held
There was no admission that title to land was raised by this suit for damages for trespass—which is a suit based on possession and does not necessarily involve any issue as to title to land or any interest in land—and there was no evidence of that fact; further there was no admission that there was a Native Court having jurisdiction and there was no proof; therefore the Judge erred in concluding that the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court was ousted by the proviso to section 12 of the Supreme Court Ordinance.
Appeal by plaintiff: Np. 3760.
O. Onyechi for Appellant.
H. U. Kaine, with him D. O. Ibekwe, for Respondents.
Related Posts:
- Joseph Osemwegie Idehen & Ors. Vs George Otutu…
- R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) v…
- R (on the application of AM) (AP) v The Director of…
- R (on the application of AM) (AP) v The Director of…
- R (on the application of Smith) (FC) v Secretary of…
- His Highness Lamidi Olayiwola Adeyemi (Alafin Of…