Home » Nigerian Cases » Supreme Court » Asuquo Etim V. The State (1982) LLJR-SC

Asuquo Etim V. The State (1982) LLJR-SC

Asuquo Etim V. The State (1982)

LawGlobal-Hub Lead Judgment Report

G. IRIKEFE, J.S.C.: This purported appeal is clearly defective. The decision appealed against was delivered on 11th November, 1980, while the Notice of Appeal against that decision was not given until 30/12/80 as the file from the lower court clearly shows. As this court is not competent to extend time in this type of matter under Section 31(4) of the Supreme Court Act (No. 12 of 1960), the purported appeal is hereby struck out.

M. BELLO, J.S.C.:  The Notice of Appeal having been filed out of time, the purported appeal is incompetent: Section 31(2) (b) of the Supreme Court Act. Being a capital offence the court cannot extend the time within which to appeal: Section 31 (4) of the Act.

The purported appeal is struck out.

C. IDIGBE, J.S.C.:  Once again, this is one occasion on which it is necessary for me to repeat the need for re-examination of the Supreme Court Act 1960 as regards the lack of power or authority on the part of this court to enlarge time within which to appeal from decisions in murder trials. It is curious that while this court can enlarge time within which to appeal from decisions of the Court of Appeal not only in civil matters but also in less heinous criminal offences, it cannot do so in murder trials. I refer, of course, to Section 31 (4) of the Supreme Court Act 1960.

Faced as we are with this section we are unable to do anything although it does appear to me on reading the record of proceedings in the present matter that there is prima facie an arguable “appeal”. Feeling satisfied that I have once again in performance of my duty as before bemoaned this apparent unsatisfactory situation and again the need for review of this particular section of the Supreme Court Act, I feel that there is nothing else I can do but agree with my learned brothers that this appeal must be struck out and it is accordingly struck out.

See also  Umar V. Frn & Ors (2020) LLJR-SC

A. O. OBASEKI, J.S.C.:  The Notice of Appeal against the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal given on 11th November, 1980 was filed on 30th December, 1980. The appellant should have filed his notice by 10th December, 1980 as prescribed by Section 31(2)(b) of the Supreme Court Act 1960 to enable this court assume jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

In the circumstances, the appeal is incompetent and I hereby strike out the appeal.

K. ESO, J.S.C.: There is no appeal before this court. Having regard to the fact that the appeal was filed out of time and under Section 31 (4) of the Supreme Court Act, 1960, the time within which to file the notice of appeal cannot be extended. The purported appeal is reluctantly struck out.


Other Citation: (1982) LCN/2163(SC)

More Posts

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004: Short Title

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004 Section 47 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment,

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004: Interpretation

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004 Section 46 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Interpretation. In this Act – Interpretation “Commission” means the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission established

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004: Savings

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004 Section 45 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Savings. The repeal of the Act specified in section 43 of this Act shall not

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others