Home » WACA Cases » Ate Kwadzo V. Robert Kwasi Adjei (1944) LJR-WACA

Ate Kwadzo V. Robert Kwasi Adjei (1944) LJR-WACA

Ate Kwadzo V. Robert Kwasi Adjei (1944)

LawGlobal Hub Judgment Report – West African Court of Appeal

Claim for declaration of title to land—Need for plan.

There was a double hearing before the Native Court and two intermediate appeals but the boundaries of the land in dispute to which plaintiff was declared to be entitled remained uncertain.

Held, that before a declaration of title is given the land to which it relates must be ascertained with certainty, the test being whether a surveyor can from the record produce an accurate plan of such land.

Appeal from the Provincial Commissioner’s Court (on appeal from the Avatime State Council, on appeal from the Akome Native Tribunal).

N. A. 011ennzi for Appellant.

K. A. Bossman (with him S. Sakyi Djan) for Respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by the President :-

Although this case has been twice heard in the Native Tribunal of Akome and has passed on appeal through the Courts of the Avatime State Council and the Provincial Commissioner of the Eastern Province till it has eventually reached this Court, it is impossible even at this stage to ascertain with any degree of accuracy the boundaries of the land in dispute to which the Plaintiff has been given a declaration of title. The acid test is whether a surveyor, taking the record could produce a plan showing accurately the land to which title has been given. We are quite certain that no surveyor could do that in this case. This Court has repeatedly pointed out that before a declaration of title should be given the area of land to which it relates must be ascertained with certainty. That has not been done here. The Appeal is. accordingly allowed, the judgment of the Provincial Commissioner’s Court, including the order as to costs, is set aside and it is ordered that if any sum has been paid in pursuance thereof it shall be refunded the case is remitted to the Provincial Commissioner’s Court with the direction that that Court shall rehear the case entirely de novo with the assistance of a proper plan showing the land in dispute.

The judgments in both the Native Tribunal of Akome and Ate Kwadzo the Avatime judgment in the case will be delivered by the Robert‘ Provincial Commissioner’s Court after the rehearing. At the Kwasi Adjei rehearing all costs incurred in any Court except this Court will be .

See also  Sophia Malm V. Maurice Meyer Wulff (1937) LJR-WACA

Kmgdon,

in the discretion of the Provincial Commissioner.

The Appellant is awarded costs in this Court assessed at £28 17s. 9d.

More Posts

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004: Short Title

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004 Section 47 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment,

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004: Interpretation

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004 Section 46 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Interpretation. In this Act – Interpretation “Commission” means the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission established

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004: Savings

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004 Section 45 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Savings. The repeal of the Act specified in section 43 of this Act shall not

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others