Home » WACA Cases » Buraimo Adegbite V. Chief Imam Quadri B. Lawal Ashiru Oleolo (1948) LJR-WACA

Buraimo Adegbite V. Chief Imam Quadri B. Lawal Ashiru Oleolo (1948) LJR-WACA

Buraimo Adegbite V. Chief Imam Quadri B. Lawal Ashiru Oleolo (1948)

LawGlobal Hub Judgment Report – West African Court of Appeal

Trespass—Practice and Procedure—Defendants sued in representative capacity
—Order for representation made on application by plaintiffs—Defendants not
consenting thereto—Supreme Court (Civil Procedure) Ruks, Order 4 rule 3—
English Rules of the Supreme Court, Order 16 rule 9.

Facts

Under the English Rules of the Supreme Court, authority to defend in a representative capacity proceeds from the Court, and application for such authority may be made by either side.

Held

Under the Nigerian rules, while the approval of the Court is required, the authorisation is to be given by the other persons interested to sue or defend.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Nigeria.


Respondents to have costs of this appeal assessed at 09 12s. Od. Judgment of the Supreme Court varied.

See also  Yaw Asuah V. Essi Egyirwah & Ors (1954) LJR-WACA

More Posts

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004: Short Title

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004 Section 47 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment,

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004: Interpretation

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004 Section 46 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Interpretation. In this Act – Interpretation “Commission” means the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission established

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004: Savings

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004 Section 45 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Savings. The repeal of the Act specified in section 43 of this Act shall not

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others