Home » WACA Cases » Chief J. T. Princewill Amachree V. W. F. H. Newington (1952) LJR-WACA

Chief J. T. Princewill Amachree V. W. F. H. Newington (1952) LJR-WACA

Chief J. T. Princewill Amachree V. W. F. H. Newington, District Officer, Degema (1952)

LawGlobal Hub Judgment Report – West Africa Court of Appeal

The above rule reads: “Where a person has jointly with other persons a ground for instituting a suit, all those other persons ought ordinarily to be made parties to the suit.”

The nine appellants as co-plaintiffs sued the respondent claiming a single amount for damages for assault and false imprisonment. In the course of the case for the plaintiffs the trial Judge invited Counsel for the plaintiffs to consider whether it was competent for them to bring one action, and Counsel said it was as they were all detained at the same time and in the same places.

He did not call all the plaintiffs to give evidence. At the end of the case the Judge nonsuited the plaintiffs on the ground that it could not be said they had jointly together a ground for instituting a suit for the damage each had suffered, and each must sue separately. The plaintiffs appealed.

Held

Order 4, rule 2, permits joinder of plaintiffs but not joinder of causes of action. There was no joint tort, for the damage caused to each plaintiff could only be personal to each of them. The suit was wrongly constituted and a non-suit was the proper order.


Appeal dismissed.

See also  Abakah Nthah V. Anguah Bennieh (1927) LJR-WACA

More Posts

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004: Short Title

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004 Section 47 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment,

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004: Interpretation

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004 Section 46 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Interpretation. In this Act – Interpretation “Commission” means the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission established

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004: Savings

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004 Section 45 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Savings. The repeal of the Act specified in section 43 of this Act shall not

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others