Home » Nigerian Cases » Supreme Court » Danjuma Garba & Ors V. The State (1981) LLJR-SC

Danjuma Garba & Ors V. The State (1981) LLJR-SC

Danjuma Garba & Ors V. The State (1981)

LawGlobal-Hub Lead Judgment Report

G. IRIKEFE, J.S.C.

I agree that, as conceded by appellants’ counsel, this appeal lacks merit. Accordingly, I would dismiss the appeal of each appellant. Appeal dismissed.

A. O. OBASEKI, J.S.C.: I agree with the learned counsel for the appellants that there is nothing that can be usefully urged in favour of the appellants. On the merits, the appellants, self confessed participants in the robbery, were properly convicted and their appeal properly dismissed by the Federal Court of Appeal. The fact that they were hired to carry the loot of the robbery is irrelevant as they accompanied those who hired them to the scene of robbery and saw action at the scene which sent one of the night guards, Idirisu, flying away for safety.
The appeal lacks merit and is hereby dismissed.

K. ESO, J.S.C.: In this appeal, Mr. Shola Rhodes, learned counsel for the appellants has nothing in law to urge in favour of the appellants. I think he is right. The appellants were rightly convicted and their appeal rightly dismissed by the Federal Court of Appeal. It is a good thing learned counsel has gone through the record thoroughly. I have also done the same and could not find anything in favour of the appellants. It is regrettable though that although the Lagos State D.P.P. was served with notice of hearing in this case, no appearance has been put up by him to assist this court. Appeal is dismissed.

A. N. ANIGAOLU, J.S.C.: There being nothing to urge in favour of the appellants, this appeal must be, and is hereby dismissed.

See also  Chief Gani Fawehinmi V. Nigerian Bar Association & Ors (No.2) (1989) LLJR-SC

M. L. UWAIS, J.S.C.: I agree that there is no merit in this appeal as was rightly pointed out by learned counsel for the appellants in the brief filed. There is also no substance in the point raised that the appellants were not found by the trial Judge to be armed. I agree that the appeal should be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. The decision of the Federal Court of Appeal is hereby confirmed.


SC.14/1980

More Posts

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004: Short Title

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004 Section 47 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment,

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004: Interpretation

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004 Section 46 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Interpretation. In this Act – Interpretation “Commission” means the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission established

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004: Savings

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004 Section 45 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Savings. The repeal of the Act specified in section 43 of this Act shall not

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others