Interpretation of Documents and Intention – COURT HOLDING
The cardinal presumption in the interpretation of documents is that the parties have intended what they have in fact said
Oyenuga and Four Others v. Ife University Provisional Council (1964) NCLR (page 8, lines 18-25) H.C. (West)
Related aspect of Law: Contract
Facts of the Case
The Plaintiff and four others brought a consolidated action against the defendants to recover salary and emoluments in lieu of notice for a specific period of time.
The Plaintiff was employed as a professor at the university of Ife under the service conditions in force in 1962. These conditions provided that appointments were tenable for three years in the first instance and, on confirmation, until retirement at 60 or 65.
However, the practice in universities was to waive the probationary three-year period in the case of a professor and to make the appointment until retirement. The Plaintiff’s appointment was terminated before the expiry of this period for alleged misconduct and he was given six months’ notice of such termination. Accordingly, the present proceedings were instituted to recover salary and emoluments.
Ack: Alan Milner. All Rights Reserved (LawHub NG).
Related Posts:
- C. I. Olaniyan & Ors. V. University Of Lagos & Anor…
- Joseph Osemwegie Idehen & Ors. Vs George Otutu…
- R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) v…
- R (on the application of AM) (AP) v The Director of…
- R (on the application of AM) (AP) v The Director of…
- R (on the application of Smith) (FC) v Secretary of…