Invasion of Niger Republic by Nigerian led Forces to restore democracy and the international legal framework permitting the invasion
INTRODUCTION
On 26 July 2023 the presidential guard in Niger Republic, a West African state, overthrew the Government of President Mohamed Bazoum.
The Heads of State of West African States under the aegis of the ECONOMIC COMMUNITY OF WEST AFRICAN STATES (ECOWAS) met in Abuja, Nigeria’s capital, and issued 7 days ultimatum to the General Abdourahamane Tchiani led junta to restore democracy or be flushed out by the use of force.
Prohibition Of The Use Of Force Under International Law And The Concept Of State Sovereignty
Political leadership of a sovereign state or nation is a domestic affair. The general principle of international law is that all independent states are sovereign in their internal affairs to the effect that no other nation is permitted to interfere in the internal affairs of other sovereign nations as provided for under Article 1 of the UN Charter.
The concept “sovereignty” also extends to the norms of international law to the effect that the invasion of sovereign states or country by external forces are prohibited under international law as provided for under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter.
The said Article 2(4) evinces thus:
2(4) “All Member (States) shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.” (Words in bracket and bolded, mine).
The PURPOSES of the United Nations as envisaged in article 2(4) of the UN Charter include , inter alia, to maintain international peace, security and DEMOCRACY. Therefore, by legal interpretation, article 2(4) only states that no sovereign state shall be invaded in a manner that is inconsistent WITH THE PURPOSES OF THE UNITED NATIONS. This follows that a sovereign state may be invaded when such invasion is CONSISTENT or INLINE WITH THE PURPOSES OF THE UNITED NATIONS!
Flowing from the foregoing, where a sovereign state behaves in such a way as to endanger the PURPOSES of the United Nations, such a sovereign state can be invaded to bring it in line with the PURPOSES of the United Nations! See United Nations General Assembly Resolution….. .. 1990 permitting the invasion of Iraq for threatening world peace by violating the territorial integrity of Kuwait.
This now takes us to articles 11(3) of the UN Charter which expounds and interprets the meaning of “or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations,” as stated in article 2(4) of the UN Charter.
Article 11(3) permits the General Assembly of the UN to report to the Security Council any state who behaves in such a way as to endanger world peace such as a military coup that removes a democratic Government from power, democracy being one of the purposes of the United Nations.
Giving vires to Article 11(3) of the UN Charter, the combined provisions of Articles 24, 41, 42, 43, 44,45 and 46 of the charter permits the use of force by the UN to maintain world peace which includes restoration of democratic rule in any country where democracy has been threatened. This use of force is applied where negotiations to restore world peace and democracy has failed as provided for in article 40 of the UN Charter.
In the circumstances of the decision to invade Niger Republic by ECOWAS, the West African subregional body had already tried peaceful negotiation but the Niger junta called the bluff, inconsequence of which on Sunday 30th July 2023 the ECOWAS Heads of State met in Abuja and gave the junta 7 days ultimatum to restore democracy or be forced out by use of military force. Nigeria was appointed to led the military intervention.
Article 53 of the UN Chart empowers the United Nations to use the help of regional organizations such as the ECOWAS to achieve the PURPOSE of the United Nations. This is the foundation of ECOWAS’s powers to invade Niger Republic. And such foundational powers is in addition to the powers given to ECOWAS in that behalf by the African Union.
Examples of Invasion of Sovereign States
Two living examples of invasion of sovereign states to restore democracy in West Africa are:
1. The 1997 Military intervention in Sierra Leone by the Nigerian led forces under General Sani Abacha’s regime in Nigeria . The military intervention was to restore democracy in Sierra Leone when a military junta led by Major Johnny Koroma overthrew the civilization Government of President Ahmed Tejan Kabbah.
2. In 2017, the Buhari Administration in Nigeria leading the ECOWAS forces invaded the Gambia to restore democracy when the President of the Gambia, Jayah Jammeh refused to handover power to the elected President , Mr Adama Barrow. Jayah Jammeh had to go into exile in Equatorial Guinea before the Nigerian led invasion was called off.
These are just two of the examples of invasion of sovereign states FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE UNITED NATIONS as envisaged by international law under the UN Charter.
Sovereignty of States under International Law
There is No Absolute Sovereignty of States Under International Law.
Though the general norm of international law is that sovereign states are supreme in their domestic laws, however, this is not absolute.
I venture to say that the GreenTree Agreement which enforced the International Court of Justice judgment on Bakassi Peninsula have put the Nigerian residents of the peninsula under the protection of international law but not under the absolute domestic laws of Cameroon, yet Bakassi is Cameroon territory, and the domestic laws of Cameroon applies in the territory, and the Nigerians there residing there are foreigners.
However, the Green Tree Agreement being international law, have exempted the Nigerian aborigines of Bakassi of being subjected to certain immigration laws of Cameroon and some other internal laws of Cameroon.
This demonstrates the fact that in some instances, domestic laws are subject to international law. As a principle, any domestic law of any country that is inconstant with the principle of jus cogens or peremptory norm of general international law is illegal, invalid, null and void, and in such a case, international law would take precedence over such domestic law.
Conclusion
The notion therefore that each state or independent nation is absolutely independent in its internal affairs is nothing but ignorance and fallacious.
Nigeria and ECOWAS have the power under international law to invade Niger Republic for the purposes of the United Nations.
Image credit: Opinion Nigeria
About Author
Manfred Ekpe Esq. is a Nigerian born activist, a lawyer and Legal Adviser to Pan African Parliament, Headquartered in Kampala. He speaks in international conferences. He is a proprietor of school, author and writer. He has his legal opinions cited widely and published by reputable publishers of legal works. His legal works are available on the internet.
