Search LawGlobal Hub

Lasisi Akanni Buraimoh Vs Rebecca Ayinke Bamgbose (1988)

LawGlobal-Hub Lead Judgment Report

NNAEMEKA-AGU, J.S.C.

This is an appeal by the defendant against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, which had reversed the judgment of Okuribido, J., who had dismissed the plaintiff’s claim for title under native law and custom to and possession of that piece or parcel of land situate lying and being at Oseni Street, Obele Kolade, Lawanson, Surulere.

The case in the court of trial turned on whether the land in dispute was that of the plaintiff or the 1st defendant. At the court of trial a number of facts were really not in dispute. They were:

(i) That the plaintiff claims the land in dispute through one Joseph Olusoye Johnson who was granted the land by Abayomi Anjorin Family on a form of lease in 1940 at an annual rent of 5/- and a bottle of gin;

(ii) That Johnson was put in possession and erected a house on it in 1940, rebuilt in between 1944 and 1945;

(iii) That the land was formerly called Obele Kolade, later No.5 Obele Kolade village, then 20 Ekundayo Street and in 1960 Oseni Street; and

(iv) That as a result of a Supreme Court judgment in suit No.215 of 1951 Abayomi Anjorin Family lost title to the land, including the land in dispute, to Alago Asalu Family.

Up till this point, there was no dispute. From this point, however, the conflicting claims of both sides had different bases. Plaintiff claimed that some time after the said judgment, Alago Asalu Family partitioned the land the subject of suit No. 215/1951, and as a result of the partition the land in dispute became part of the land of Alhaja Suwebatu Falohun, a member of the family. The Alhaja, by a receipt dated 29th November, 1969 sold the land in dispute to Joseph Olusoye Johnson, and later by a deed of conveyance dated 22nd December, 1969, registered as No. 61 at Page 61 in Vol.1307 of the Deed, Registry, Lagos. Alhaja Falohun and Johnson conveyed the land in dispute to the plaintiff in fee simple.

See also  Prophet Malim Sheriff Kajola Vs Commissioner Of Police (1973) LLJR-SC

From the point of difference, the 1st defendant’s case was also different. His case was that after the 1951 judgment Aboki Bada Family took possession of the land. On the 8th of November, 1962, the land was advertised for sale by a licensed Auctioneer, Mr. T.A.T. Martins. He denied partition of the family property of Aboki Asalu Family, a branch of Alago Asalu Family, and allocation of any part of the family property to Alhaja Suwebatu Falohun. Rather by a power of attorney dated 6th August, 1962, and registered as No. 58 at page 58 in Volume 1204 of the Lands Registry, Lagos, the principal members of Aboki Bada Family, including Alhaja Suwebatu Falohun gave a power of attorney to Chief O.S. Bada to sell and convey the land in dispute. Pursuant to that power, Chief Bada sold the in dispute to the 1st defendant and conveyed same to him by a deed of conveyance dated 9th day of July, 1969, which is registered as No. 13 at page 13 in Volume 1297of the Lands Registry, Lagos. The 1st defendant stated that he had always been in possession of the land and had erected a house on it and exercised other acts of possession and ownership over it.

So from the state of the cases before the High Court, the main issue was whether the plaintiff bought the land in dispute from Johnson who bought from Alhaja Suwebatu Falohun or the 1st defendant bought the land from Chief O.S. Bada, the attorney of Aboki Bada Family.

The findings of the learned trial Judge on the above contentious issues were summarized by Ademola, J .C.A., in his judgment in the Court of Appeal thus:

See also  Jide Aladejobi V. Nigeria Bar Association (2013) LLJR-SC

“(a) That the Supreme Court decision in Suit 215/1951 settled the question of title between Anjorin Abayomi and Alago Asalu in favour of Asalu family of which Aboki Bada is a branch.

(b) That after the case the family land was partitioned as in the Plan Exh. G and a portion of the land shown on Exh. G was allotted to Alhaja Suwebatu Ejide Falohun.

(c) The learned Judge also found that the first respondent was unable to show that what he bought by the conveyance he got was part of the 1.25 acres out the 59.9 acres of family land which Chief O. S. Bada was authorised by the family in the power of attorney Exh. F given him to sell.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *