Home » WACA Cases » Mu’azu Nunku V. IGP (1955) LJR-WACA

Mu’azu Nunku V. IGP (1955) LJR-WACA

Mu’azu Nunku V. IGP (1955)

LawGlobal Hub Judgment Report – West African Court of Appeal

Magistrate’s Court—Court of Record—inherent jurisdiction to punish summarily contempt committed “sedente curia”—no right of appeal.

Facts

A Magistrate, Grade III, presiding at the trial of the appellant for a motor vehicle offence, committed the appellant for five days’ imprisonment for contempt of the Court committed in the face of the Court.

The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court on the ground that there was no trial and in particular that the appellant was not pleaded to the charge and that the Magistrate made no finding of guilty. Counsel submitted that the charge should have been brought under section 133 of the Criminal Code.

The Judge of the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and held that the lower Court had power to punish summarily for contempt committed in the face of the court without any charge or trial, and further that no appeal lay against the conviction.

The Court upheld the decision of the Judge of the Supreme Court, and held that as the
Magistrate’s Court was a Court of Record, it had power to summarily punish for contempt committed in the face of the Court and pointed out that this was borne out by section 6 of the Criminal Code, which reads :

“6. Nothing in this Ordinance or in the code shall effect the authority of courts of record to punish a person summarily for the offence commonly known as contempt of court ”
and is different from an offence under section 133 of the Criminal Code which requires the normal procedure of a charge, plea, trial and verdict.

See also  Owusu Asuma Lotsu V. Modjifa Kudjey (1951) LJR-WACA

The Court also found that there was no appeal in this case, as a right of appeal w as statutory, and the Magistrates’ Courts (Appeals) Ordinance, which gives a convicted person the right to appeal, only does so when there is a conviction and the appellant pleaded to the charge.

Held

(1) A Magistrate’s Court is a Court of Record and as such has the power to punish summarily for contempt committed in the face of the Court.

(2) No appeal lies from such punishment.


Appeal struck out.

More Posts

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004: Short Title

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004 Section 47 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment,

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004: Interpretation

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004 Section 46 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Interpretation. In this Act – Interpretation “Commission” means the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission established

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004: Savings

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004 Section 45 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Savings. The repeal of the Act specified in section 43 of this Act shall not

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others