Home » WACA Cases » Nii Abossey Okai II & Ors V. Nii Ayikai II & Anor (1951) LJR-WACA

Nii Abossey Okai II & Ors V. Nii Ayikai II & Anor (1951) LJR-WACA

Nii Abossey Okai II & Ors V. Nii Ayikai II & Anor (1951)

LawGlobal Hub Judgment Report – West African Court of Appeal

Value and effect of admissions in civil cases—Nature thereof—Against whomthey operate—Admissions not estoppels and not conclusive.

Facts

In a civil case admissions by a party are evidence of the facts asserted against, but not in favour of, such party. But they are not estoppels or conclusive against the party against whom they are tendered.

The evidence of admissions in oral testimony must be clear and unambiguous, but the rule is not so strict in the case of documentary admissions.

Unless explanations are given which satisfy the Court that admissions should not be so regarded, due weight should be given to them as such.

Held

A person cannot by his acts prove anything in his favour ” so that dealings with property are not of the same value as admissions against interest.


Appeal dismissed.

See also  Johannes Englang V. J. Mope Palmer (1955) LJR-WACA

More Posts

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004: Short Title

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004 Section 47 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment,

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004: Interpretation

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004 Section 46 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Interpretation. In this Act – Interpretation “Commission” means the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission established

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004: Savings

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004 Section 45 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Savings. The repeal of the Act specified in section 43 of this Act shall not

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others