Home » WACA Cases » Rex V. Afose & Ors (1934) LJR-WACA

Rex V. Afose & Ors (1934) LJR-WACA

Rex V. Afose & Ors (1934)

LawGlobal Hub Judgment Report – West African Court of Appeal

Rules of His Majesty’s Judges governing questions to prisoners by Police Officers—Local variation of Rule 8 to embrace illiterate persons.

Facts

A statement mentioning the other. accused was made by one of the accused to a Police Inspector. This was subsequently read out to him by the Inspector in the presence of two other accused. These two accused were not cautioned but said that the statement was correct, It was subsequently read over to yet others of the accused who were mentioned in it and- the/ said nothing. The trial Judge held the statement made by the one accused was inadmissible against the other accused but sought the opinion of the Court thereon.

Held

Ruling of trial Judge • affirmed. and Rule S to be_read with proviso.

See also  Lartiph Adel Madjoub V. Omanhene Kweku Nkansa II & Ors (1940) LJR-WACA

More Posts

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004: Short Title

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004 Section 47 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment,

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004: Interpretation

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004 Section 46 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Interpretation. In this Act – Interpretation “Commission” means the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission established

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004: Savings

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004 Section 45 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Savings. The repeal of the Act specified in section 43 of this Act shall not

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others