Home » Nigeria » Law Firms » Section 23 Indian Contract Act 1872 (What considerations …)

Section 23 Indian Contract Act 1872 (What considerations …)

1. Short title. Extent. Commencement. Saving. 2. Interpretation-clause. 3. Communication, acceptance and revocation of proposals. 4. Communication when complete. 5. Revocation of proposals and acceptances 6. Revocation how made 7. Acceptance must be absolute. 8. Acceptance by performing conditions, or receiving consideration 9. Promises, express and implied. 10. What agreements are contracts. 11. Who are competent to contract. 12. What is a sound mind for the purposes of contracting. 13. “Consent” defined. 14. “Free consent” defined. 15. “Coercion” defined. 16. “Undue influence” defined. 17. “Fraud” defined. 18. “Misrepresentation” defined. 19. Voidability of agreements without free consent. 19A. Power to set aside contract induced by undue influence Agreement void where both parties are under mistake as to matter of fact 21. Effect of mistakes as to law. 22. Contract caused by mistake of one party as to matter of fact. 23. What considerations and objects are lawful, and what not 24. Agreement void, if considerations and objects unlawful in part 25. Agreement without consideration, void, unless it is in writing and registered, or is a promise to compensate for something done, or is a promise to pay a debt barred by limitation law. 26. Agreement in restraint of marriage, void. 27. Agreement in restraint of trade, void. Saving of agreement not to carry on business of which good-will is sold. 28. Agreements in restraint of legal proceeding void. Saving of contract to refer to arbitration dispute that may arise. Saving of contract to refer questions that have already arisen. Saving of a guarantee agreement of a bank or a financial institution. 29. Agreements void for uncertainty. 30. Agreements by way of wager, void. Exception in favour of certain prizes for horse-racing. Section 294A of the Indian Penal Code not affected. 31. “Contingent contract” defined 32. Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event happening 33. Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event not happening. 34. When event on which contract is contingent to be deemed impossible, if it is the future conduct of a living person. 35. When contracts become void which are contingent on happening of specified event within fixed time. When contracts may be enforced, which are contingent on specified event not happening within fixed time. 36. Agreement contingent on impossible events void. 37. Obligation of parties to contracts. 38. Effect of refusal to accept offer of performance. 39. Effect of refusal of party to perform promise wholly. 40. Person by whom promise is to be performed. 41. Effect of accepting performance from third person. 42. Devolution of joint liabilities. 43. Any one of joint promisors may be compelled to perform. Each promisor may compel contribution. Sharing of loss by default in contribution. 44. Effect of release of one joint promisor. 45. Devolution of joint rights. 46. Time for performance of promise, when no application is to be made and no time is specified. 47. Time and place for performance of promise, where time is specified and no application to be made. 48. Application for performance on certain day to be at proper time and place. 49. Place for performance of promise, where no application to be made and no place fixed for performance. 50. Performance in manner or at time prescribed or sanctioned by promise. 51. Promisor not bound to perform, unless reciprocal promisee ready and willing to perform. 52. Order of performance of reciprocal promises. 53. Liability of party preventing event on which the contract is to take effect. 54. Effect of default as to that promise which should be first performed, in contract consisting of reciprocal promises. 55. Effect of failure to perform at fixed time, in contract in which time is essential. Effect of such failure when time is not essential. Effect of acceptance of performance at time other than that agreed upon. 56. Agreement to do impossible act. Contract to do an act afterwards becoming impossible or unlawful. Compensation for loss through non-performance of act known to be impossible or unlawful.
See also  Section 186 Indian Contract Act 1872 (Agent's authority may be expressed or implied)
57. Reciprocal promise to do things legal, and also other things illegal. 58. Alternative promise, one branch being illegal. 59. Application of payment where debt to be discharged is indicated. 60. Application of payment where debt to be discharged is not indicated. 61. Application of payment where neither party appropriates. 62. Effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contract. 63. Promise may dispense with or remit performance of promise. 64. Consequences of rescission of voidable contract. 65. Obligation of person who has received advantage under void agreement, or contract that becomes void. 66. Mode of communicating or revoking rescission of voidable contract. 67. Effect of neglect of promisee to afford promisor reasonable facilities for performance. 68. Claim for necessaries supplied to person incapable of contracting, or on his account. 69. Reimbursement of person paying money due by another, in payment of which he is interested. 70. Obligation of person enjoying benefit of non-gratuitous act. 71. Responsibility of finder of goods. 72. Liability of person to whom money is paid, or thing delivered, by mistake or under coercion. 73. Compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract. Compensation for failure to discharge obligation resembling those created by contract. 74. Compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated for. 75. Party rightfully rescinding contract, entitled to compensation. Section 76-123 (Repealed) 124. “Contract of indemnity” defined. 125. Rights of indemnity-holder when sued. 126. “Contract of guarantee”, “surety”, “principal debtor” and “creditor”. 127. Consideration for guarantee. 128. Surety‟s liability. 129. “Continuing guarantee”. 130. Revocation of continuing guarantee. 131. Revocation of continuing guarantee by surety‟s death. 132. Liability of two persons, primarily liable, not affected by arrangement between them that one shall be surety on other‟s default. 133. Discharge of surety by variance in terms of contract. 134. Discharge of surety by release or discharge of principal debtor. 135. Discharge of surety when creditor compounds with, gives time to, or agrees not to sue, principal debtor 136. Surety not discharged when agreement made with third person to give time to principal debtor. 137. Creditor‟s forbearance to sue does not discharge surety. 138. Release of one co-surety does not discharge others. 139. Discharge of surety of creditor‟s act or omission impairing surety‟s eventual remedy. 140. Rights of surety on payment or performance. 141. Surety‟s right to benefit of creditor‟s securities. 142. Guarantee obtained by misrepresentation invalid. 143. Guarantee obtained by concealment invalid. 144. Guarantee on contract that creditor shall not act on it until co-surety joins. 145. Implied promise to indemnify surety. 146. Co-sureties liable to contribute equally. 147. Liability of co-sureties bound in different sums. 148. “Bailment”, “bailor” and “bailee” defined. 149. Delivery to bailee how made. 150. Bailor‟s duty to disclose faults in goods bailed. 151. Care to be taken by bailee. 152. Bailee when not liable for loss, etc., of thing bailed. 153. Termination of bailment by bailee‟s act inconsistent with conditions. 154. Liability of bailee making unauthorized use of goods bailed. 155. Effect of mixture, with bailor‟s consent, of his goods with bailee‟s. 156. Effect of mixture, without bailor‟s consent, when the good can be separated. 157. Effect of mixture, without bailor‟s consent, when the goods cannot be separated. 158. Repayment, by bailor, of necessary expenses. 159. Restoration of goods lent gratuitously. 160. Return of goods bailed, on expiration of time or accomplishment of purpose. 161. Bailee‟s responsibility when goods are not duly returned. 162. Termination of gratuitous bailment by death. 163. Bailor entitled to increase or profit from goods bailed. 164. Bailor‟s responsibility to bailee. 165. Bailment by several joint owners. 166. Bailee not responsible on re-delivery to bailor without title. 167. Right of third person claiming goods bailed. 168. Right of finder of goods. May sue for specific reward offered. 169. When finder of thing commonly on sale may sell it. 170. Bailee‟s particular lien. 171. General lien of bankers, factors, wharfingers, attorneys and policy-brokers.
See also  Section 197 Indian Contract Act 1872 (Ratification may be expressed or implied)
172. “Pledge”, “Pawnor” and “Pawnee” defined. 173. Pawnee‟s right of retainer. 174. Pawnee not to retain for debt or promise other than that for which goods pledged. Presumption in case of subsequent advances. 175. Pawnee’s right as to extraordinary expenses incurred. 176. Pawnee’s right where pawnor makes default. 177. Defaulting pawnor’s right to redeem. 178. Pledge by mercantile agent. 178A. Pledge by person in possession under voidable contract. 179. Pledge where pawnor has only a limited interest. 180. Suit by bailor or bailee against wrong-doer. 181. Apportionment of relief or compensation obtained by such suits. 182. “Agent” and “principal” defined. 183. Who may employ agent. 184. Who may be an agent. 185. Consideration not necessary. 186. Agent‟s authority may be expressed or implied. 187. Definitions of express and implied authority. 188. Extent of agent‟s authority. 189. Agent‟s authority in an emergency. 190. When agent cannot delegate. 191. “Sub-agent” defined. 192. Representation of principal by sub-agent properly appointed. Agent‟s responsibility for sub-agent. Sub-agent‟s responsibility. 193. Agent‟s responsibility for sub-agent appointed without authority. 194. Relation between principal and person duly appointed by agent to act in business of agency. 195. Agent‟s duty in naming such person. 196. Right of person as to acts done for him without his authority. Effect of ratification. 197. Ratification may be expressed or implied. 198. Knowledge requisite for valid ratification. 199. Effect of ratifying unauthorized act forming part of a transaction. 200. Ratification of unauthorized act cannot injure third person. 201. Termination of agency. 202. Termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject-matter. 203. When principal may revoke agent‟s authority. 204. Revocation where authority has been partly exercised. 205. Compensation for revocation by principal, or renunciation by agent. 206. Notice of revocation or renunciation. 207. Revocation and renunciation may be expressed or implied. 208. When termination of agent‟s authority takes effect as to agent, and as to third persons. 209. Agent‟s duty on termination of agency by principal‟s death or insanity. 210. Termination of sub-agent‟s authority. 211. Agent‟s duty in conducting principal‟s business. 212. Skill and diligence required from agent. 213. Agent‟s accounts. 214. Agent‟s duty to communicate with principal. 215. Right of principal when agent deals, on his own account, in business of agency without principal‟s consent. 216. Principal‟s right to benefit gained by agent dealing on his own account in business of agency. 217. Agent‟s right of retainer out of sums received on principal‟s account. 218. Agent‟s duty to pay sums received for principal. 219. When agent‟s remuneration becomes due. 220. Agent not entitled to remuneration for business misconducted. 221. Agent’s lien on principal’s property. 222. Agent to be indemnified against consequences of lawful acts. 223. Agent to be indemnified against consequences of acts done in good faith. 224. Non-liability of employer of agent to do a criminal act. 225. Compensation to agent for injury caused by principal’s neglect. 226. Enforcement and consequences of agent‟s contracts. 227. Principal how far bound, when agent exceeds authority. 228. Principal not bound when excess of agent‟s authority is not separable. 229. Consequences of notice given to agent. 230. Agent cannot personally enforce, nor be bound by, contracts on behalf of principal. Presumption of contract to contrary. 231. Rights of parties to a contract made by agent not disclosed. 232. Performance of contract with agent supposed to be principal. 233. Right of person dealing with agent personally liable. 234. Consequence of inducing agent or principal to act on belief that principal or agent will be held exclusively liable. 235. Liability of pretended agent. 236. Person falsely contracting as agent, not entitled to performance. 237. Liability of principal inducing belief that agent‟s unauthorized acts were authorized. 238. Effect, on agreement, of misrepresentation or fraud by agent. Section 239-266 (Repealed) SCHEDULE (Repealed)

Section 23 Indian Contract Act 1872

Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 is about What considerations and objects are lawful, and what not. It is under CHAPTER II of the Act. CHAPTER II is titled OF CONTRACTS, VOIDABLE CONTRACTS AND VOID AGREEMENTS.

See also  Section 20 Indian Partnership Act 1932

What considerations and objects are lawful, and what not

The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless—


it is forbidden by law; or


is of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law; or


is fraudulent ; or


involves or implies, injury to the person or property of another; or


the Court regards it as immoral, or opposed to public policy.


In each of these cases, the consideration or object of an agreement is said to be unlawful. Every agreement of which the object or consideration is unlawful is void.



Illustrations


(a) A agrees to sell his house to B for 10,000 rupees. Here Bs promise to pay the sum of 10,000 rupees is the consideration for As promise to sell the house, and As promise to sell the house is the consideration for Bs promise to pay the 10,000 rupees. These are lawful considerations.


(b) A promises to pay B 1,000 rupees at the end of six months, if C, who owes that sum to B, fails to pay it. B promises to grant time to C accordingly. Here, the promise of each party is the consideration for the promise of the other party, and they are lawful considerations.


(c) A promises, for a certain sum paid to him by B, to make good to B the value of his ship if it is wrecked on a certain voyage. Here, As promise is the consideration for Bs payment and Bs payment is the consideration for As promise, and these are lawful considerations.


(d) A promises to maintain Bs child, and B promises to pay A 1,000 rupees yearly for the purpose. Here, the promise of each party is the consideration for the promise of the other party. They are lawful considerations.


(e) A, B and C enter into an agreement for the division among them of gains acquired or to be acquired, by them by fraud. The agreement is void, as its object is unlawful.


(f) A promises to obtain for B an employment in the public service and B promises to pay 1,000 rupees to A. The agreement is void, as the consideration for it is unlawful.


(g) A, being agent for a landed proprietor, agrees for money, without the knowledge of his principal, to obtain for B a lease of land belonging to his principal. The agreement between A and B is void. as it implies a fraud by concealment, by A, on his principal.


(h) A promises B to drop a prosecution which he has instituted against B for robbery, and B promises to restore the value of the things taken. The agreement is void, as its object is unlawful.


(i) As estate is sold for arrears of revenue under the provisions of an Act of the Legislature, by which the defaulter is prohibited from purchasing the estate. B, upon an understanding with A, becomes the purchaser, and agrees to convey the estate to A upon receiving from him the price which B has paid. The agreement is void, as it renders the transaction, in effect, a purchase by the defaulter, and would so defeat the object of the law.


(j) A, who is Bs mukhtar, promises to exercise his influence, as such, with B in favour of C, and C promises to pay 1,000 rupees to A. The agreement is void, because it is immoral.


(k) A agrees to let her daughter to hire to B for concubinage. The agreement is void, because it is immoral, though the letting may not be punishable under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).


See also:

Section 22 Indian Contract Act 1872 (Contract caused by mistake of one party as to matter of fact)

More Posts

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others