Set Success Enterprises & Co Ltd V. Ibeju-lekki Local Government Council & Anor (2021)
LAWGLOBAL HUB Lead Judgment Report
IBRAHIM MOHAMMED MUSA SAULAWA, J.S.C.
The present appeal is a natural reaction by the Appellant against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Lagos Judicial Division, delivered on June 12, 2008 in appeal no. CA/L/489/2005. By the judgment in question, the Court below, coram Ogunbiyi, JCA (as then was), Mshelia and Nwodo, JJCA, dismissed the Appellant’s appeal against the Judgment of the trial High Court delivered on May 19, 2005 (LD/1037/2002), which dismissed in part the Appellant’s claim against the Respondent for outstanding balance of contract sum and damages for breach of contract.
BACKGROUND FACTS
The Appellant is a limited liability company having the registered office thereof at 20/22 Adedoyin Street, Ketu, Lagos Slate. On the other hand, the Respondent is a Local Government Council having its Administrative Secretariat al Akodo, Lagos State.
The genesis of the case leading the to instant appeal is traceable to May 27, 2002. Indeed, that was the day the Appellant instituted the case in the trial High Court, thereby seeking against the Respondent the total sum of N26.5 Million being special and general damages for a stabilization contract awarded to the Appellant In the Respondent.
By the statement of claim, filed along with the writ of summons thereof on the date in question, the Appellant claimed against the Respondent:
- Particulars of special damages.
a. The sum of N20,007076.60 being the balance of the contract sum of N35,007076.60k due to the plaintiff in respect of the stabilization of a 16.5 kilometers laterite road from Ajegbenwa to Dongo in Ibeju-Lekki Local Government Area of Lagos State; and
b. The sum of N1,500,000.00 being retention fee.
- General Damages:
The sum of N5,000,000.00 being general loss suffered by plaintiff as a result of the unquantified damages suffered by the failure of the Defendant to pay the whole contract sum as and when due.
- Interest on the special damages at the rate of 36% per annum till the date of judgment and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum until the judgment debt and necessary costs is fully paid by the Defendant.
The Respondent reacted by filing a statement of defence to the claim, to which the Appellant filed a reply. Pleadings having been filed and exchanged between the respective parties, the suit proceeded to trial. In the course of which, the Appellant called two witnesses and tendered thirteen (13) documentary evidence, which were admitted as exhibits by the trial Court.
Contrariwise, the Respondent called one witness who testified in chief but failed to show up for cross-examination by the Appellant’s counsel.
At the close of evidence, the trial Court deemed it expedient to order for written addresses. Consequent whereupon, the Appellant filed its written address. However, the Respondent, for reason best known thereto, failed to file any written address as ordered by the trial Court.
The trial Court, not unexpectedly, proceeded to deliver the judgment on the said 19/05/2005, to the conclusive effect:
I am satisfied on the evidence before me that the claimant has been able to prove on the balance of probabilities, his entitlement to N6 Million being the balance of the 60% first instalment as per Exhibit P 10. The law is trite that the Court can award less but not more than what is claimed if that is what is proved by the evidence
Leave a Reply