Home » Articles » The Defenses a Lawyer Will Use in a Sex Crime Case

The Defenses a Lawyer Will Use in a Sex Crime Case

Image source

One of the reasons a sex crime case is so delicate is because the stakes are high for everyone involved, especially for the accused.

If you’re ever convicted of a sex crime, life as you know it may very well be over. The tentacles of this conviction will spread into every aspect of your life, affecting them in many ways, none of which will be positive.

Your saving grace would be a competent sex crimes lawyer who has a track record of getting innocent off the hook before they begin to face the consequences of a conviction.

These lawyers typically have a bag full of defenses that they will use to convince the judge and jury that the allegations against you hold no water.

We’ll be fully discussing some of such defenses in this article.

Consent

One of the biggest questions in many sex crime cases is about consent. Consent is all about whether both people involved agreed to what happened. If one person later claims that things weren’t consensual, the lawyer might argue otherwise.

Imagine the case of two people who are seeing each other. If one later says the other forced them, the defense might look for evidence that shows they both said “yes” at the time. The lawyer could dig up texts, and messages on social media, or even talk to friends who might have witnessed their interactions.

The idea here is to show that the accused genuinely believed the encounter was consensual.

See also  Online Mediation as a Tool for Dispute Resolution in Nigeria - Ifezie Christabel Ogechi

Mistaken Identity

There are times when a person might be wrongly accused of something they didn’t do. This is known as mistaken identity. It often happens when the crime occurs quickly or in a setting where the victim doesn’t get a clear look at the alleged attacker.

In these cases, the lawyer might work to prove that their client was simply not there when the crime happened.

They could gather alibi witnesses who can say where the accused was at the time or pull in security footage from a nearby store or street.  

The Claims are False

Sadly, there are times when people make false accusations simply because of jealousy, revenge, or just a big misunderstanding. When that happens, the lawyer’s job is to show that the claims against their client don’t hold water.

To fight against false accusations, the lawyer gathers evidence that supports the accused’s side of the story. This might include digging into the accuser’s motives or any history they might have that suggests they could be lying.

All you have to do is hire a lawyer who has a knack for digging even the most hidden modus operandi

No Proof

In any case, the prosecution has to provide solid evidence to prove someone is guilty. If they can’t do that, the defense can argue that there simply isn’t enough proof to support the claims.

The defense might highlight inconsistencies in the accuser’s story or question the reliability of the witnesses.

For example, if a witness’s account changes several times, the defense will definitely point that out. The concept of reasonable doubt can come into play if your lawyer is able to establish doubt about the credibility of the accusation, evidence, or even testimonies. If they can successfully do this, they can even file a motion for the case to be dismissed. 

See also  Understanding the Impact of Brain Injuries

Insanity Defense

Sometimes, a lawyer might use an insanity defense and argue that their client wasn’t mentally fit to understand their actions at the time of the crime.

To make this defense stick, the lawyer usually brings in mental health experts who can explain what is going on with the accused’s mind.

To make this defense work, they usually need help from mental health experts. These experts can explain the person’s mental health problems and how they might have influenced their actions. It’s a delicate topic, true, but it can be really important in helping the judge understand the whole situation.

More Posts

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004: Short Title

Section 47 EFCC Act 2004 Section 47 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment,

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004: Interpretation

Section 46 EFCC Act 2004 Section 46 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Interpretation. In this Act – Interpretation “Commission” means the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission established

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004: Savings

Section 45 EFCC Act 2004 Section 45 of the EFCC Act 2004 is about Savings. The repeal of the Act specified in section 43 of this Act shall not

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others