Home » United Nations » United Nations Security Council Resolution 1329 – International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1329 – International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1329 – International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

Resolution 1329 (2000)

The Security Council,

Reaffirming its resolutions 827 (1993) of 25 May 1993 and 955 (1994) of8 November 1994,

Remaining convinced that the prosecution of persons responsible for seriousviolations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the formerYugoslavia contributes to the restoration and maintenance of peace in the formerYugoslavia,

Remaining convinced also that in the particular circumstances of Rwanda theprosecution of persons responsible for genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law contributes to the process of national reconciliationand to the restoration and maintenance of peace in Rwanda and in the region,

Having considered the letter from the Secretary-General to the President of theSecurity Council dated 7 September 2000 (S/2000/865) and the annexed letters from the President of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia addressed to the Secretary-General dated 12 May 2000 and from the President of theInternational Tribunal for Rwanda dated 14 June 2000,

Convinced of the need to establish a pool of ad litem judges in theInternational Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and to increase the number of judges in the Appeals Chambers of the International Tribunals in order to enable theInternational Tribunals to expedite the conclusion of their work at the earliestpossible date,

Noting the significant progress being made in improving the procedures of theInternational Tribunals, and convinced of the need for their organs to continue theirefforts to further such progress,

See also  United Nations Security Council Resolution 2192 – Middle East

Taking note of the position expressed by the International Tribunals thatcivilian, military and paramilitary leaders should be tried before them in preferenceto minor actors,

Recalling that the International Tribunals and national courts have concurrentjurisdiction to prosecute persons for serious violations of international humanitarian law, and noting that the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the InternationalTribunal for the Former Yugoslavia provide that a Trial Chamber may decide tosuspend an indictment to allow for a national court to deal with a particular case,

Taking note with appreciation of the efforts of the judges of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, as reflected in annex I to the letter from theSecretary-General of 7 September 2000, to allow competent organs of the United Nations to begin to form a relatively exact idea of the length of the mandate of theTribunal,

Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,

  1. Decides to establish a pool of ad litem judges in the InternationalTribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and to enlarge the membership of the AppealsChambers of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and theInternational Tribunal for Rwanda, and to this end decides to amend articles 12, 13and 14 of the Statute of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and toreplace those articles with the provisions set out in annex I to this resolution anddecides also to amend articles 11, 12 and 13 of the Statute of the InternationalTribunal for Rwanda and to replace those articles with the provisions set out inannex II to this resolution;

2. Decides that two additional judges shall be elected as soon as possible asjudges of the International Tribunal for Rwanda and decides also, without prejudiceto Article 12, paragraph 4, of the Statute of that Tribunal, that, once elected, theyshall serve until the date of the expiry of the terms of office of the existing judges,and that for the purpose of that election the Security Council shall, notwithstandingArticle 12, paragraph 2 (c) of the Statute, establish a list from the nominationsreceived of not less than four and not more than six candidates;

See also  United Nations Security Council Resolution 2045 – Côte d'Ivoire

3. Decides that, once two judges have been elected in accordance withparagraph 2 above and have taken up office, the President of the International tribunal for Rwanda shall, in accordance with Article 13, paragraph 3, of the Statuteof the International Tribunal for Rwanda and Article 14, paragraph 4, of the Statuteof the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, take the necessary steps assoon as is practicable to assign two of the judges elected or appointed in accordancewith Article 12 of the Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda to bemembers of the Appeals Chambers of the International Tribunals;

4. Requests the Secretary-General to make practical arrangements for theelections mentioned in paragraph 2 above, for the election as soon as possible oftwenty-seven ad litem judges in accordance with Article 13 ter of the Statute of theInternational Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, and for the timely provision to theInternational Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Tribunal forRwanda of personnel and facilities, in particular, for the ad litem judges and theAppeals Chambers and related offices of the Prosecutor, and further requests him tokeep the Security Council closely informed of progress in this regard;

5. Urges all States to cooperate fully with the International Tribunals andtheir organs in accordance with their obligations under resolutions 827 (1993) and955 (1994) and the Statutes of the International Tribunals, and welcomes thecooperation already extended to the Tribunals in the fulfilment of their mandates;

6. Requests the Secretary-General to submit to the Security Council, as soon as possible, a report containing an assessment and proposals regarding the date ending the temporal jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia;

See also  United Nations Security Council Resolution 2515 – Non-proliferation/Democratic People’s Republic of KoreaLetters from the President of the Council on the voting outcome (S/2020/246) and voting details (S/2020/270)

7. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.

Adopted by the Security Council at its 4240th meeting,on 30 November 2000.

More Posts

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. We ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world, among others